Dr. Mammel,
I won't be able to email you the articles I mentioned until tomorrow. Tom MacWood is the real expert, though, and I am sure his involvement will aid you greatly in getting to the bottom of what really happened. He is a tremendous asset for all of us. As I have said above, I suspect we will end up with what was written in the pamphlet and in the 1925 description and history of the course. But you never know.
____________________________________________________
Dr. Jay,
Nice to see you are now behaving reasonably, but might I ask why the sudden resurgence in interest on your part? After all, you wanted nothing to do with this entire line of reasoning yesterday. A waste of time, I think you said, and "wild surmises and agendas," among other things. What happened?
______________________________________________
Mr. Stamm, that really is a lucid, even-handed, respectful, and intelligent assessment. And your kinda cute too, so I will take that under advisement as well if you know what I mean. Who would've wondered whether Wee Willie Watson was worthy? Aside from those pesky Southern Californians and the omnipotent Tom MacWood, that is?
Seriously, in my email the other day I forgot all about the early hotel golf in Pasadena and the article posted by MacWood reminded me. The early nine hole might have been either the course of the Hotel Raymond or The Green. I'll have see if I can dig that stuff up.
______________________________________
Tom Paul,
I hate to be a Flemma, but I believe the name is Edward Sayres, not Richard Sayers. Perhaps that is why you guys couldn't find the Scrapbooks. You had the name wrong.
I am not sure what you are doing on this thread. You've brought no new information, have nothing really to offer to the topic at hand, yet here you are, trying to make the conversation about you and your pet projects. If you want to talk about your article, why don't you start a thread?