You are right, I rarely use caddies. I am a social player and thus don't need the expertise and I certainly don't want to pay for it. I recall my caddie at Merion asking me how I knew the yardages because I didn't ask him and it was my first go. My reply was simple - I didn't know the yardages - it was guess work. Too many people treat golf like some sort of battle and are looking for ways to get leg up rather than going to the range, walking the course, visiting the putting and earning that advantage - or heaven forbid just admit that they are a social golfer and not able to compete properly. Its a great pity, but that is the way of the world these days.
Ciao
Sean - Again, I love you, but this is more hogwash!!! Every golfer wants to have some idea of the challenge presented to him. On a new course (one you have never played) the excitement of learning what is over the next hill is a wonderful adventure. But, a short lasting one. At some point a player learns the subtle (and not so subtle) challenges of a given course, at which point golf becomes almost exclusively about achieving a comparative level of success. I can see where playing "in the dark" (as you propose that you do) would present a type of personal satisfaction, but at the end of the day the object is to get the ball from Point A to Point B in fewer strokes than your opponent. Golf is not about judging whether you can "guess-timate" the distance of a given shot better than I can. It is about executing the shot at hand to the best of your ability with whatever information is available to you at the time. You want the available information to be limited to what the golfer can see with his eyes. Fair enough. But, this form of golf has not been played since a caddie first gave advice to his player back in the days of yore. Once that boundary was crossed it opened the door to everything else that has followed. If caddies (and their electronic cousins) did not enhance the golfing experience for most players they would have faded away long ago. I do not have a problem with a player trying to gather as much information as possible to help him with his decision making process (as long as it is done in a timely fashion) because I'm convinced golf is not just about leap frogging from one place to the next. It is about making decisions based on your personal experience and talent, and no caddie, GPS or laser device can improve either.
I would make the argument that GPS devices could help bring back design features that have gone out of vogue, like blind shots. Blind shots would not be as offensive to so many golfers if they could "see" over the hill with a GPS device. What about firm & fast courses? As you well know, playing a F&F course completely transcends distance-only decision making. I would also argue that as a player becomes more familiar with a course he requires less and less input from an outside source.
Playing the "pure" form of golf you do is fun. It is the way I played when I first took up the game. But, you know what? On the course that I played regularly I knew how far a shot was from a given tree, rock or fencepost. It took a lot of trial and error, but I figured it out eventually. But knowing these distances did not detract from my golfing experience or cause me to become bored with the course. Just the opposite, it allowed me to focus on the other parts of the challenge at hand... which I did not always do when I was so focused on determining the distance.
I'm signing off now as I am leaving for jolly ole London in the morning and I must pack.
Stay pure, Sean... it's what we love about you!!!
Cheers!