Ken- great to see Hampshire on a list! Anyone who has lived in SW Michigan or NW Indiana and loves golf knows about Hampshire. It is top ten or anything- no way. But a pretty darn good golf course and really fun to play. Thanks for bringing back some great memories. I coached high school golf for 4 years in that area, and both enjoyed watching some good hs players struggle with some of the holes there, and really enjoyed playing the course myself.
Brian- good question on why Bay Harbor over Arcadia. It is a "feel" thing for me, so I will probably struggle to articulate this well, but I will give it a shot. I've only played each course twice. I think it has something to do with my bias against "links" courses that are not really links. Somehow, Bay Harbor feels more true to the original land they had to work with, even though I am sure they moved a lot of dirt. It does not come across to me as a golf course that is trying to be an old-style links course. Arcadia is a good golf course, for sure, but I just struggle to fully enjoy any flat farmland turned into a "links" course, regardless of how well it is done. When I have played in Great Britain, I just did not enjoy Kingsbarns or The European Club near as much as TOC, Portrush, Lahinch, Cruden Bay, etc.
The other comment I would make in comparing Bay Harbor to Arcadia is something about the views and the aesthetic experience. Again, this is difficult to articulate well, but there was something about the Links nine at Bay Harbor and the views that seemed cooler to me. While you are not quite as close to the water as you are at Arcadia in some spots, there are a few shots at Bay Harbor that make you think you might hit it in the lake on your next shot. I certainly recognize that you can have a very good argument about the strategic nature of either design, but I have not played either course enough to engage in that argument