Regarding Sean's suggestion in the Woking v The Addington thread that the par fives at Woking don't really achieve very good-ness let alone greatness, it has just struck me that if you combined the 1st and 2nd holes, you would have a hole that I think would be a world class short par five.
Anyone agree, or am I crazy?
While you lose the par three 2nd, you would preserve the shot that makes it so awesome. While playing it I thought while looking up to the green from 120m short that the shot I was seeing would make a great approach shot to a longer hole, and that would then be included as well for those who laid up with their second.
Those who had a crack at it in two would still face the wrath of missing the green that exists currently, with the third shot becoming more difficult the closer and further right you find yourself.
Here's how the hole would play:
The drive: Line would be the trees on the right that currently stand between the 1st green and 2nd tee. Any drive too far left would be blocked out and have to lay up.
The ballsy 2nd shot: you've pumped your drive 260-290 yards, so you have 240-210 left to the green. Basically all that is good about the current 2nd is retained.
The third shot from a 120 yard lay up. The further left you lay up, the easier the shot, but the short bunker and the creek ensure you still have to plan the placement of your lay-up.