Just back from an excellent study tour, organised by the AGREF, french geenkeepers association. We had a guided technical visit of St-Andrews Old, New, Jubilee, Castle, Carnoustie & Kingsbarns.
Fascinating to see behind the scenes & discover against popular belief, some agronomical challenges, especially on the new built courses. TOC was, as always, close to perfection in terms of presentation, although I was surprised to see the new tee on 17 under construction (being built on the driving range
!! Any thoughts
)
On Thursday, some of us had a knock around the Burnside course at Carnoustie. The first 3 holes are a little disappointing, but then the course winds through the championship course with some fantastic holes, typical bunkering and a couple of holes worthy of the championship course, notably the 14th & 17th. Great value for money at 35 pounds.
Anyway, what really struck me, was the obvious competition between The Castle & Kingsbarns. IMO, both courses have exagerated rugged landscapes, more suited to other parts of the UK. The Fife coastline seems to be generally more subtle in comparison. I admire the boldness & conviction of both designs, Kingbarns already looks a truly great golf course. I feel the Castle needs more time & a few minor changes that are already underway.
Given the agricultural nature of both sites, I just wonder if fescue will dominate, thus maintaining an important links characteristic. Poa & ryegrass is present & very invasive, something that sort of betrays the authenticity. The guys in charge of greenkeeping seem very competent & know better than anyone the challenge ahead.
Older, more natural sites have soil profiles that favour the management of fescue. I really hope the newer courses overcome this battle. IMO, the architects have taken risks and deserve the long term success of their works !
Any thoughts ?