Dave,
I find it interesting that of the 6 waterfalls that are found on holes 11 and 13, there is only one you keep referring to time and time again, especially in light of the fact that the other 5 originate on top of the ridgline where its feasible that a pond or small creek could exist naturally to feed it. So yes its true of all the 6, there is that one that obviously could not exist there naturally...but does that mean we ignore the other 5?
If we want to talk about phony things on the golf course though, its odd how you easily overlook everything else that exists artifically, like the mowed grass, the cart paths, the flattened tees, the flagstick, the bunkers, etc, etc....yet only focus on the waterfalls of which 5 of 6 could just as easily be more naturally occuring than everything esle...the irony is indeed thick here.
But then again, once again, this isn't about waterfalls is it? This is about having an axe to grind with one persons architecture style and completly ignoring the fact that Jim Enghs courses:
1) Are Fun to play
2) Have cool greens that are devilishily contoured and a blast to putt on.
3) Most of his holes are very strategic and require real thought processes in club selection.
4) They give the golfer lots of oohhs and ahhhs thru views and other visual delights along the way.
So yes its true, I would rather play a manufactured course like this day in and day out, over most of the other stuff out there that is less tame but also boring, lacks any strategy, and puts me to sleep.