David,
I wasn't actually trying to say anything about MHC specifically. Someone on the thread asked about the veracity of newspaper articles and I saw that and thought it relevant in a general sense as to how to value historic sources. While its quite possible that in any single case, one source is good, in general, I think the idea of multiple, confirming sources is a good idea.
Tom Mac agrees, which I appreciate. Frankly, it is a good philosophical discussion and I find you finding it strange, well...... strange.
I wasn't looking for an argument of any kind, but on golf club atlas, I guess the arguments come looking for me!
I agree most reporters took (then and now) basic press releases from whatever source, perhaps doing some more research to make a story their own. If so, its even more representative of the concept that information put in the paper has a certain spin to it, then and now. All of which goes to say what you, Tom and the rest of us know - historical research will always require some interpretation.
TePaul,
Because I really don't want to get even as snippy as I occaisionally got on the MCC threads, I will acknowledge your attempt at humor but decline to expand on it, since its potentially as inflammatory as it is funny. But, IF I were to start a rumor, I would add that HH Barker was really the founding father of ASGCA but missed the train to Pinehurst and so they made Donald Ross the first President........Why not, right?