JKM,
What does it get on the Doak Scale??
I don't know. I've never seen a copy of the Confidential Guide to know the rating numbers. What would you rate Thanksgiving Point? I would say its in the same range as that.
JKM,
Here is the Doak Scale:
1: Very basic course; clear architectural malpractice and/or poor maintenance. Avoid even if desperate for a game.
2: mediocre course with little architectural interest, but nothing really horrible. (Play it in a scramble and drink a lot of beer).
3: about the level of the avg. course in the world.
4: modestly interesting; with at least a couple of distinctive holes or some scenic interest. Also reserved for some very good courses which are much too short or narrow to provide sufficient chalenge for low-handicappers.
5: Well above the avg. course, but the middle of this scale. A good course if in the vicinity, but not worth setting aside a day to visit.
6: A very good course, definitely worth a game, but not necessarily worth a special trip to see. It shouldn't disappoint you.
7: An excellent course, worth checking out if within 50-100 miles. You can expect sound design; interesting hiles; good conditions and a pretty setting; if not necessarily anything unique to the world of golf.
8: One of the very best in the region and worth a special trip to see. Could have some drawbacks, but will make up for them with something really special.
9: Outstanding course. One of the best in the world with no weaknesses. Should see in your lifetime.
10: Nearly perfect. If you skipped even one hole you would miss something worth seeing. MUST see these courses to appreciate how good golf architecture can get.
I don't think that course is up to TP's standards based on the pics you sent...but pics can be decieving. As for TP, I would put it at 5.5 - 6 IMO.