I am sure Ken is a nice man. I did not know about his former stuttering problem and am sorry if I offended anyone. I am not that harsh to exploit someone else's handicap. However, I do expect a degree of quality from commentators. For me, Ken doesn't meet that level.
Don't take this personally, you who are sympathetic towards him and all that he has overcome. I agree, that he overcame quite a challenge, and I agree, he must be given credit for that. But Ken Venturi, I am sure, wants to be treated like everyone else. In fact, it think it would be disrespectful to Ken to treat him any other way, and this includes criticism. I am sure that he wouldn't want someone to "go easy on him" because of his handicap. I know I wouldn't, and personally, I find criticism refreshing because it ultimately helps me become a better person.
Anyway, the object of my thread was to discuss his ignorant, and cliché-ish views towards design and also maintenance. I suppose I could use any commentator as an example, but I am sorry, it just happened to be Mr. Venturi.
I am tired of analysts talking up the things that don't make the game better, like lengthening courses and making bunkers easier and more predictable to play out of. It really pissed me off the way the commentators talked up the changes at Augusta, including Ken, Jim, and everyone else.
Anyway, I really don't care that much about Ken. He is the least of my worries, and actually, I don't think he even makes my "Top 500 Worry list." I still don't think he's a good commentator, but don't think that it is personal with me.