I am not even sure its a matter of degrees. All soils hold a certain amount of water and get saturated at a certain point.
Sand, of course, performs best, but it varies.
The fact is that slope and providing surface inlets removes several inches of water without it having to "soak in." Mike Strantz tile system every 15' or other systems that rely on soaking through soil won't remove water as fast as a catch basins. Soils have a small percentage of pore space to allow water to move through. A catch basin is virtually unimpeded. If large enough (ditto for the pipe sizes) a drainage system can take virtually any amount of rain that falls.
Budgets usually preclude draining all but the smallest storms on golf courses, or everday up to maybe once every 2 to 5 years storms. There is a trade off in occaisionally having lots of rain for a big event (like the US Open) and paying to drain that event. But for most courses, some semblance of being able to put that big outing back out on the course soon after all but the biggest rains helps the bottom line.
Of course, this lecture is brought to you by CB (catch basin) Brauer. I have been hammered on this site (mostly by the long departed Tommy N) for advocating drainage via catch basins. But, as Ben notes, I do know how to drain a course built in clay soils and drain it quickly. I realize that catch basins near greens and in oft used landing zones can detract from the play experience, even if 200 catch basins totaling perhaps 300 sq feet rarely affect play, being literally 0.007% of the total turf surface area of a golf course. IMHO, that is not a bad tradeoff to get water off your course and keep your soils from being saturated periodically.