Chris,
I have to respectively disagree. I read what you are saying and I think to myself, "Yeah, he's right. That's what makes it so good!"
See, for me, Saguaro is a great course for what it's not. Yeah I get it, it's not Troon Monument, Desert Highlands, or Val Verde. That is the beauty of it for me. Scottsdale has a lot of target desert golf courses with internal water, pretty grass and nice pedigree's. There is nothing wrong with that by the way. Cholla--it could be argued--is one of the top 5 of that genre in the valley. I call these courses "supermodels". I mean that in the most respectful way. I know Marisa Miller is hot, but I'm sure she wouldn't look twice at me. I felt that way about Cholla and and Troon Monument. The style of golf I was forced to play at hose two courses got pretty old, pretty quick.
Unless you like lots of grass, unobstructed (no houses) views of the 4 peaks, and dozens of big cacti, you would hate the scenery at Saguaro.
At Saguaro I used almost every shot I had in the bag. Low and high, 80 foot putts, driver on some tees, hybrid on others. Three legitimately drivable par 4's. Three par 4's of 450 yds+. A 250yd+ par 3. A split fairway. Fairway bunker that are--gasp--in the fairway! I just consider it a layout that has many pluses and not a ton of minus'.
The lack of love from some circles leads me to think that we get conditioned for certain courses in certain areas. Georgia is supposed to look like Peachtree and Augusta. Cali is supposed to have courses that look like Pasatiempo, Olympic, Cypress. North Carolina sand hills are supposed to look like Pinehurst and Pine Needles. Then a Long Shadow (Georgia), Rustic Canyon (Cali), Tobacco Road (North Carolina) come along and break people's perceptions about what type of golf is "supposed" to be in a certain area. I think Saguaro--as much press as it gets--is still a bit underrated due to this fact. It doesn't look or play like desert golf. That is why I feel it must be visited.