Ed Baker,
I've met and played golf with a number of people, through this site, and have enjoyed every occassion and everyone I've met.
Reminiscent of the Pizza Man, the other night I was having dinner with Sean (SPDB), Brad Miller, Chipoat, TEPaul, and GeoffC at a restaurant in New York City. As we were discussing some specific issues and scaning some aerials, the waiters, who appeared to be golf enthusiasts looked over the aerials and started to comment, specifically about cart paths.
I had no doubt that we could have turned them into GCA junkies in the time it takes for TEPaul to make a short post
I think if you're a golfer, this is the next contagious stage, golf course architecture.
I think we're brought together by our common love for the game and architecture. I would have said classic architecture, but there are those on the site that adhere to the revisionist school, so I thought I would avoid excluding them.
While we may differ, as Jeff Forsten pointed out, we still share the love of the study and discussion of golf course architecture. This love, discussion and study may not be shared with those in our immediate company or family, causing friction or secretive lurking and posting, proof positive of one's love and willingness to take risks, all in the name of GCA.
As Tom Paul pointed out, it would be an admirable goal to positively influence those who would alter their courses.
To be the genesis for the restoration of holes or courses adversely altered in the past. Hopefully, with time and growing numbers of participants or lurkers, Tom Paul's dream will become a reality.
The constructive side of GCA is, the learning never stops !