I think today's results ought to disabuse anyone of the notion that 12 needs to be lengthened.
I didn't watch much of the tournament today but when I flipped over for a moment they said that due to the wind in the player's face making club selection difficult that some players had ended up FORTY YARDS short of the pin. They said that was in the middle of the water, I'd think that was short of the water so maybe they were exaggerating, but even in the middle of the water is a pretty bad shot for a top pro!
This is exactly the type of hole ANGC needs, to test those players who have some shotmaking skills versus those who select clubs based on distance, and add/subtract yards based on the wind and other factors. If they can't hit a low shot under the trees then they deserve whatever happens to them on the windy days.
Sure, its an easy hole when there's no wind, but if that's how the merit of golf holes are determined these days I guess we may as well retire TOC, since there are precious few holes that can stand up to the modern game when there's "nae wind"...
Despite what some revisionist historians wish to believe, the 12th has always been pretty easy for pros on the days when there's no wind like on Thursday. Don't you guys remember that hole business they used to talk about looking at not the flag on the 12th but two other flags nearby and based on when one goes limp that's when you hit. Dunno if that's still the way to play that hole, but the effect of the wind on the 12th is certainly nothing new. If it played 190 yards instead of 150 it might be less of a test of skill since it'd be easier to keep the ball under the tree line!