I'm going to take offense with Lloyd's commentary: Coyne's book only half-fits on this site, as only half of it is meant to deal with golf course architecture. The other half is no "self-aggrandizing" stunt; it allows us to entertain the impossible, as George Plimpton did two generations ago. If Coyne had been after "self-aggrandizement," he would have walked to a course or two, ridden a donkey, hitch-hiked a ton and taken his share of buses. What he did was hoof it the entire way and good for him.
Lloyd, do you really think editors are so stupid as to fall for the type of ploy you suggest? Have you read Coyne's previous efforts? If so, then you will agree that his proposals are valid and deserve a contract. From my perspective, he is three-for-three. I'd read him just as often as I'd read Turk Pipkin.