"I'm glad to read that Coore and Crenshaw were influenced by Prairie Dunes, because it makes perfect sense to me. I had the privilege of playing Sand Hills before I played Prairie Dunes. The Sand Hills experience was simply overwhelming and it instantly became my favorite course. A few years later, I made it to Prairie Dunes with my pal, Brian Doyle Murray, who is a member. On the third hole, I said, "this golf course is the grandfather of Sand Hills." As an earlier poster implied, it is likely that there would never have been a Sand Hills had Prairie Dunes not come along earlier, but the most astonishing fact about the place is that it was conceived 70 some years ago. In the intervening decades, it had no real architectural-style competition that I'm aware of. Sure, there are courses that were built in those years on similar sand hills landforms, perhaps most notably in the Pinehurst area, but for many years, Prairie Dunes stood as sui generis until Dick Youngscap got hooked up with C&C. The vision and the genius of Perry Maxwell and the faithful completion by his son, Press, is surely one of the most significant achievements in golf course architecture in this country. If Prairie Dunes is not the progenitor of Sand Hills, then nothing is."
Terry Lavin:
You're probably right about that but I suppose the surest way to tell would be to simply get Ben Crenshaw and Bill Coore to weigh in on this kind of analysis.
But even without that I'm going to throw something of an observational test at you anyway.
Just go to Ran Morrissett's course review (and extensive photographs) of both golf courses. Go first to SH. Pay close attention to the look of just miles and miles of rolling, treeless "prairie" with very little vegetative overgrowth other than prairie grasses.
Now go to PD. This will take some imagination on your part, but try to imagine PD with no trees, no vegetative overgrowth, no houses, powerlines or poles, nothing but the way it must have once been with miles and miles of rolling, prairie grass as far as the eye can see.
Now go back again with that in mind to SH and look again carefully at its architecture in its setting and compare it to the architecture of PD in that same setting that it probably once was.
If you can do that as I just did, I think you will find that it's pretty hard to find, with just a few minor exceptions such as the interesting tree strategies on PD's #12 and #14, two courses and their architecture that are as similar in look and seemingly style as those two are!
Was it a coincidence? I doubt it but obviously the only ones who could say with assurance would be Ben and Bill.