I have a hard time understanding why so many people are so critical of the golf course.
It is a perfect looking golf course, from a maintenance standpoint. Nothing can be 'too perfect' either, because perfect is as good as it gets. There is no reason to be critical of the course for looking the way it does, being so green and in such shape.
The bunkers are beautiful in my eyes. They make Augusta, well, Augusta. Big, bold, and very strategic.
The greens, which are said to really need to be seen to personally to understand their greatness, have been hailed as some of the best in the world.
Despite the added length, when thought realistically about it, that has nothing to do with course because they are meant for the Masters, which is part of Augusta and defining it as a whole. They are not for members or mortals like us; perhaps if they moved the members tees back to make it umplayable for the majority of players a cause for concern would be legitimate, but that has not and probably will not happen. If anything, the added trees and the addition of some light rough should be the biggest cause of concern for evaluating the course.
When it comes down to it, the whole aura of Augusta, the extravagance that is the Masters, and the perfection of the entire week makes it one I look forward to more so than any other in the golf world.
Cheers,
Jordan