I am not detached enough to be objective, I am sure, but I am tickled to see the conversation. One of the things I hoped would happen at Black Creek is that people would remember and debate the holes. I just haven't enjoyed holes that don't inspire a little argument, or at least thought.
One of my favorite reactions to Black Creek came from a three-time All-American collegiate golfer who said, "I love the shots I have to play, but I hate that bunker on the 13th fairway!" I asked why. He said, "It's right where you want to hit the ball! I'm going to hit a three iron off the tee and another three iron at the green just because of that damn bunker!" To which I said, "Why do you want to hit your ball in the bunker?"
Some guys- no matter how good they can hit the ball- just don't get it.
As to the squared off edges and greens, I like them. Look at some (not all, I'll admit) of the ancient pictures from Raynor's courses when they were young. A lot of that. I have Lookout Mountain's original hand drawn, hand colored plans- the greens have this same characteristic. They add an element not found with more, shall we say, artistically constructed greens. They seem to define the strategy in a new way for those who wish to pay attention.
One of the things I somewhat regret- although I doubt we would change it if we could do it again- is that the 17th (Biarritz) hole is not 300 yards long. That would be the modern equivalent of the Biarritz holes Raynor built in the '20's- a driver par three. Can you imagine the screaming?!? It would be great.
I can't wait to see what Doak, Bahto, Keiser, Klein, and the whole committee come up with at Bandon Dunes in Old Macdonald. It's going to be great. I am sure it will be much better in some regards than what we have at Black Creek, but I am really happy with what Brian Silva gave us there. I never get tired of it.
This discussion makes me smile. This is what I hoped for. Thanks, Chip, for starting the thread.