Golf Digest's website has a pretty interesting article focusing on how six pros substantially improved their rank in a particular statistical category tracked by the tour. (E.g., Sean O'Hair went from 68th to 1st in accuracy from 250-275 yards; he averages a remarkable 48 feet, 11 inches on such shots.) In any event, the article got me wondering whether and to what extent architects look at fairly granular PGA Tour data -- like accuracy from specific distances, whether on average, or even for the 150th ranked guy -- in thinking about how to design specific holes. For example, if we know that for 175-200 yard shots, the 150th ranked guy in that particular category -- an obviously very good player who's not as good as other pros at that particular shot -- hits it X feet away on average, is that relevant to how an architect might defend a par 3 of that distance?