You didn't answer my question. Have you played Peacock Gap?
Yes.
The reason I get excited about the greens there - to the point of calling them "interesting, challenging, convoluted, unusual" and worth a play - is that I think Forrest turned a really boring course, flat with nothing really going on, into a course that keeps your attention throughout and actually makes you laugh or even giggle from time to time.
If Forrest had gone in with a typical set of greens, I don't think anyone would be interested in playing Peacock Gap. With the greens he designed, I don't think you could say that.
What do you think about Peacock Gap from that perspective?