Last fall I had the opportunity to play one of the top ranked courses built in the last 10-15 years. For the purpose of this discussion, I decided not to say which one, but some of you will figure it out. It's located on a beautiful piece of golf property, though the "look" is quite homogenous throughout. A lovely golf club.
It's designed by a top notch architect, who apparently mounted the Sand Pro himself to do the finish grading on all eighteen greens. The architect would review each green with the superintendent, making sure his creations were maintainable.
The greens are extremely complex, with all sorts of ridges, mounds, false fronts, and other little features. I played one round of golf during my visit. I shot 81 or 82, with maybe 37 or 38 putts.
I wasn't putting that well, but I also kept getting fooled on reading the putts, especially on short putts. I consider getting fooled on a putt as a badge of honor; I'm pretty decent at reading greens, and generally admire the green that causes a misread. In this case, however, I misread so many that it started getting old. The day ended on the 490 yard final hole, where I went driver, 3-wood, brilliant 35 yard bunker shot, misread 3.5 footer.
The day of golf was most noteworthy for all the misread putts.
Do you admire the occasional misread?
Does it irritate you to misread several in a round?
Do you feel that the traits I am describing in this golf course constitute good architecture?