Kyle, I'm not following you at all.
If you think that on balance, a caddy program that fosters the drug trade is not good, I'll sitpulate.
If kids don't want to caddy for nothing, I absolutely agree. It has to be worth their time.
If you think that however great the Evans Scholars program is (and it is), it serves a relatively small number of kids, compared to, say, Pell Grants, or National Merit Scholarships, again I'll stipulate.
But my point was that apart from the simple cash exchange of a few bucks for a morning or an afternoon of a teenager's time, the give-and-take of employer and employee, caddying serves a cultural function in golf, as borne out by what seems to be a very large number of GCA members. to put it bluntly, it teaches kids how they ought to behave on a golf course, and for a fair number of them it fosters an interest in playing the game.
You disagree with that?