Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.
So now I look at that land that Eric shows and I think wow what a course could go there.... but then I think man, the world is running out of beautiful open space pretty rapidly, and would a golf course really be an improvement there? It's pretty darn cool as is. ...Sorry for the tangent.TH
On a tangent from the tangent, bear in mind (not that it bears directly on whether the site is better left undeveloped) that the site was, in all likelyhood, covered with heavy forest before the hand of man asserted itself. All of the open space would probably have been cleared in the distant past for use as farmland. The fact that the human race is responsible for its current configuration, however, does not detract from the beauty of the site. Just be aware that it is not likely natural.
That is a very very cool-looking site, and it is fun to dream of a golf course there.And I know Eric meant this as no great statement and it is just dreaming, but seeing this, and Rich posting, reminded me of the larger issue: there are some sites on which golf courses should not be constructed.Rich's take on the Stanford University practice facility - which is by all standards absolutely fantastic - but which embarasses him as an alum, thinking what other purposes that land MIGHT have been devoted to, hit me like a ton of bricks. See, I had never thought of it that way at all and I pretty ashamed to admit that. To me, it was just a world-class practice facility, one I wished I could use. But man it's right there adjacent to some of the world's greatest hospitals and research facilities, and to devote that land to use by a few students (only the team can use it), well that is embarassing.So now I look at that land that Eric shows and I think wow what a course could go there.... but then I think man, the world is running out of beautiful open space pretty rapidly, and would a golf course really be an improvement there? It's pretty darn cool as is.This is likely what Rich is alluding to in his post also. But it takes me a bit longer to flesh things out, both in writing and for myself.So no hassles Eric, and I sure as heck don't mean this as any critique or condemnation. It just did get me thinking.There's a piece of land I drive by each day that I too envision a course on - some are likely familiar with it - corner of Foothill Expressway and Page Mill, going up to Deer Creek Road, Palo Alto. I envision holes on it every day. But right now it houses horses and is some darn fine open (Stanford-owned I'm sure) land. In the end it's better as is. Of course a golf course would be preferable to more corporate offices... not that there seems to be any danger of those being built these days!Sorry for the tangent.TH
In any event Eric, with that hay trimmed, you could be out there playing 17th-century golf right now. Just grab a 5-iron and give the ball a whack in the direction you wish to travel. Then rinse and repeat!