Bradley:
I don't think this research was meant to be applied as a blanket to all--I give the superintendents much more credit that that and presume they modify the program to assist with their ultimate goal. There is no question that this approach must be balanced with the grass varieties, weather, soils and other such cultural practices the supers have in their bag of tricks such as PGR's and light topdressing apps.
I really like that fact that supers are not finding themselves in a selling position and simply having at it. I als agree completely that the less info to members the better.
Tom P, IMO, we need more superintendent participation in this DG as I believe their skills and knowledge will become even more upfront/close and personal with the woes in the economy and in order for facilities of all kinds to survive and be successful.
"If the greens are true and consistent what difference does it make how high and how often they are being mowed."
Chris, this is exactly the key point and the bonus is a healthier plant as well that can be managed much better with less stress.
Tom J:
As it has been said, and I would tend to agree, I think this program would have more effective results on a higher stand of bent, or in your case fescue and bent. I would think that fescue would respond even better than bent given the leaf texture and growth characteristics.
Andrew H: It would seem, practically speaking, that the soils wouldn't be all that different for compaction in the Netherlands to become an issue, nor do I think the supers in the US do aerification to counter the rolling. Hopefully some of the supers who have posted can comment further on this.
Hey guys...this thread is just what I was hoping for and it has inspired me to actually get some work done today, besides making dressing and apple pies with my wife