I loved Logan's article. Merion doesn't need a PR department - I can't think of a club that does things better.
Dan,
I guess the question is better for whom?
Iredale and Merion president Rick Ill blame the condition of the course in '89 on cuts in the maintenance budget, which they attribute to a shift in the club's priorities during much of the 1980s and early 1990s. "We had a series of presidents and leaders on the board, guys who didn't have a serious interest in competitive or championship golf," says Iredale.Let's keep this in perspective. This was not Yale Golf Course in 1989. The course has always played in US Open conditions, and I can't remember Merion ever slipping below a Top 10-12 US rating. The 1989 Amateur being in August (with Chris Patton sweating like a dog!) is never going to have June US Open conditions unless you spend a ton of money. It was a Members course back in that era and guest fees were much lower and rarely did you have to worry about a tee time on The East. Now with a budget of $2.5 million (saw it published here once) and guest fees to match it, Merion has become a destination for every Peg Hunter across the world.
Is that better? I for one miss some aspects of the quieter era and while I am once again surprised to see from Craig another architect (Perry Maxwell) who did work on the course, I continue to say that if they touch those greens FOR a US Open, then Merion has gone too far.