News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


John Kirk

  • Karma: +0/-0
Quick Question - Front-to-Back Slope
« on: November 13, 2008, 08:11:00 PM »
I'm never sure whether "front to back" slope means high in the back, or if it means sloping away from the player.

Any opinions?

Phil McDade

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Quick Question - Front-to-Back Slope
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2008, 08:22:04 PM »
John:

I've always viewed it as a green that, as the player approaches it from the fairway, is higher toward the front end, and "tilted" so that the back end is lower than the front. A neat feature all too rare on many courses.

Doug Wright

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Quick Question - Front-to-Back Slope
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2008, 08:24:39 PM »
John:

I've always viewed it as a green that, as the player approaches it from the fairway, is higher toward the front end, and "tilted" so that the back end is lower than the front. A neat feature all too rare on many courses.

Agreed, John, or it would say "back to front slope," the more traditional (eg Ross) feature.
Twitter: @Deneuchre

Bart Bradley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Quick Question - Front-to-Back Slope
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2008, 08:41:23 PM »
sloping away from the player...

Fun..but tough.

Bart

Bill_McBride

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Quick Question - Front-to-Back Slope
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2008, 08:45:10 PM »
Just think about Oakmont #1, #10 and #12.  They flow with the natural slope of the land, downhill away from the clubhouse.

Here's #10 from Ran's profile:


John Kirk

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Quick Question - Front-to-Back Slope
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2008, 08:48:41 PM »
Thanks, guys.  I felt stupid asking, since it's such a rudimentary concept, but I think the phrase is ambiguous.

Kyle Henderson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Quick Question - Front-to-Back Slope
« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2008, 11:25:13 PM »
Captain,

Think of it in terms of the green being surfaced with linoleum (like Oakmont's). A ball placed on such a low friction surface will run from "front to back" if the green is higher in front.
"I always knew terrorists hated us for our freedom. Now they love us for our bondage." -- Stephen T. Colbert discusses the popularity of '50 Shades of Grey' at Gitmo

Mark_F

Re: Quick Question - Front-to-Back Slope
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2008, 11:55:30 PM »
Just think about Oakmont #1, #10 and #12.  They flow with the natural slope of the land, downhill away from the clubhouse.

Here's #10 from Ran's profile:



I love the look of the ridge that appears to run across the front of the green.

A little bit difficult to tell from a picture its dimensions, does it exert much influence on play?  It looks like it would play havoc with pins at the front.

John Kirk

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Quick Question - Front-to-Back Slope
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2008, 12:13:03 AM »
Thanks, Kyle.  That's a good way to look at it.

I agree with all here that Oakmont's 10th fairway/green transition is super sweet.

Pete_Pittock

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Quick Question - Front-to-Back Slope
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2008, 01:01:02 AM »
Winds blow from high to low and are labelled from the direction of the high.
Symmetry.

Tony_Muldoon

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Quick Question - Front-to-Back Slope
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2008, 02:58:26 AM »
Well done John Kirk for speaking up and asking the question.


Here's mine.  I have no idea what "B&I"(?)  stands for, yet it gets namechecked everytime the distance issue comes up.  Help please.
Let's make GCA grate again!

Rich Goodale

Re: Quick Question - Front-to-Back Slope
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2008, 03:04:35 AM »
Balls and Implements (i.e. clubs, in USGA/R&A-speak)

TEPaul

Re: Quick Question - Front-to-Back Slope
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2008, 07:00:30 AM »
The USGA Committee charged with regulating balls and clubs (with the R&A) used to be called the "I&B Committee" (or the "B&I Committee) but in the last few years it's been renamed the "Equipment Standards"  Committee.