I remember this one too from over fifty years ago. The 8th was always a pretty short par 4 (maybe 350 yards at most) with the back tee sort of in a perpindicular line with the midde of the 7th green.
Not until the last few decades do I think people started talking about lengthening it to make it a really long par 4 like TOC's 17th is today and like the 8th is now!
The reason for that in my recollection is Macdonald did not have room to have that length on the 8th because when he designed and built that hole there were two side by side polo fields where Piping's massive range is today.
Some say Macdonald got into a fight back then with Piping's really strong polo interests because he wanted to use their polo fields for golf holes and they definitely were not going to let him do that. Over time some assumed that's why the 8th was so short for a traditional road hole (short par 5 or long par 4).
But get this----in that really wonderful old article from 1913 by Devereux Emmet that The Creek's George Holland just found (George, you amazing motor-mouth, by the time I get finished with all that's in that article you found, YOU are going to be GOLFCLUBATLAS.com's most expert and famous researcher and not some people on here who try to make themselves that and play games with information!
)---there is a great photo of that original Biarritz in that article and in the background in the area that would be about where the back tee for #10 now is and all the way over to perhaps the right side of the 8th fairway there looks to be something of a miniature grandstand!!!
Obviously, that must have been for the race track that apparently once encircled the old side by side polo fields (that're now the massive practice range)!
PATRICK MUCCI, and the rest, do you realize that if that miniature grandstand had been kept and was still there I believe it would almost perfectly mimic where the old hotel once was and the tee shot concept on the original ROAD hole at TOC, if the tees on #8 were where they are now!?!?
Was Macdonald looking at that and conceiving of it when he designed Piping Rock??? I cannot possibly see how he could ever have missed such a thing, particularly since he did a Road Hole and green there anyway, albeit originally a very truncated one. Perhaps he thought that given a little time the club itself might prevail on the polo interests to give up some of their second field and he could've put a tee back there around were it is now and he would have a real "Road" Hole like TOC where you had to bust it right over a building for the best approach shot in!
But alas, maybe he and the club got into enough of a brouhaha where he never really mentioned this and they took down the miniature grandstand without realizing what their 8th (their Road hole) could have been someday.
One article that may not have been analyzed or considered for maybe up to 90 years and just look at all the stuff it's now revealing about Piping Rock, Macdonald/Raynor's second golf course!
PS:
I always loved the 8th back then including that it was pretty short. That green is really intense and a short iron into it was always very challenging anyway. But MacDonald may've been dreaming of and conceiving of a more exact copy of TOC's Road Hole in length here and when he couldn't get the length for a tee shot over a building, maybe he had his routing pretty much set so he just went with a short par 4 Road Hole and Road Hole green anyway!? Or maybe the old curmudgeon meant to sent the message to Piping that if this Road hole wasn't challenging enough, the reason for it wasn't his fault, it was theirs, and their anatagonistic polo interests!