I guess it's just because I'm a very severe critique of most stuff including work I've been part of.
The first thing I mean is that Whitman's work (routing and shaping) is phenomenal... and I want to make sure that down the line, he gets the credit for it.
The details were initlially shaped and done as best as we could possibly do.
There were some decisions along the way in the process that deflected the vision we originally had... some were positive, some not so, and some decisions were taken that prevented us to tie the knot, to finish the course off as well as we wanted to... people won't probably notice it... It's the just when you think you can pull it off feeling...
Down the line, Sagebrush will be unique, a large scale ground game course where you'll have to hit shots that you won't see anywhere else... People will probably love it or hate it (if they play in the Nicola valley afternoon wind... they just might go crazy). It will be well worth the trip...
But from an inside eye, they'll be thoughts of what could have been... but I guess it's the way it goes... you put so much effort into it and for whatever reason, it's just not quite the way you thought it would end up...everybody always think of what they could improve next time...
Harry Colt talked about his least worst course...
It's all about perception