The dispute has been resolved. The club and the town have exchanged easements (rights-of-way)
http://www.gloucestertimes.com/punews/local_story_239223356.html?keyword=topstoryTown, golf club set agreement over disputed landBy Patrick Anderson
Staff Writer
MANCHESTER — A century-long dispute between the town and the Essex County Club over a slice of golf course land near Lincoln Street appears to have been settled with an exchange of legal right-of-ways between the two sides.
The deal, described as an "easement exchange," would allow golf to continue on the County Club's par-three seventh hole, a chunk of which the town claims it has owned without compensation since the 19th century. It has been agreed to in principle by club representatives and was approved by selectmen Monday night.
Under the agreement, the town would receive an easement on a slice of land on the north side of the club's property near Mill Street in exchange for allowing the club to continue play on the seventh hole. That Mill Street easement will allow the town to do street improvements and connect two water lines on land owned by the club.
The exact size of the parcels in question has not been determined, Town Administrator Wayne Melville said yesterday, but a survey of the land meant to finalize the boundaries would be conducted soon.
Questions about the use and ownership of the golf course have lingered for decades and were reignited this spring during debate about where the town should locate tennis courts for use by the Manchester Essex Regional School District.
A Town Meeting article proposed by Desmond Avenue resident Timothy Gates asked the town to leverage its ownership of part of the golf course to get the club to make some of its land available as a site for the courts.
The article was amended to direct selectmen to negotiate with the club over the land, but removed any reference to tennis courts.
The job of negotiating with the club was given to Melville and Selectman Thomas Kehoe, who met with representatives of the County Club twice over the summer and presented a letter to selectmen Monday night outlining the broad strokes of the deal.
The letter was not made available yesterday, Melville said, because it had not been signed by all board members yet.
For the agreement to be finalized, the County Club's Board of Governors will need to approve the concept and attorneys for both sides will be brought in to hammer out the precise language.
Melville yesterday declined to give any estimate of the size of either of the parcels involved in the easement swap until the results of the survey is completed.
The golf course land on and around the seventh hole is within a buffer zone surrounding a well supplying town drinking water, which is monitored by the state Department of Environmental Protection.
On the root cause of the dispute over the land, Melville said at the beginning of the 20th century the town was buying land for wells at the same time the club was buying land to make a golf course and this parcel fell into dispute.
The club and now-defunct Manchester Board of Water Commissioners entered into an informal agreement allowing the golf course to use the land free of charge, which continued until this year.
The County Club owns around 180 acres of land on the School Street parcel that includes the golf course. The land, including club building, is worth around $20 million according to the last assessment information on the town Web site.
The easements will not themselves have any direct effect on the club's property tax bill.
While town officials are calling the agreement a beneficial solution to a complex problem, Gates, the man who campaigned for negotiations on the land said yesterday that the town had not gotten enough for 100 years of uncompensated use.
"As far as we can tell, the club has been given the privilege of driving over and playing on water works land they have no legal right to," Gates said. "In addition to what happens for the future, there should be compensation for past usage."
The easement going back to the town on Mill Street was not sufficient compensation, Gates said, and should have been pursued by the town through a public land taking such as eminent domain.
Kehoe said he was happy that the negotiations with the club would provide something for both parties and had not resulted in acrimony and legal battles.
"I believe this will have the best impact on the largest number of people in town," Kehoe said. "The (Mill Street) parcel was a piece of land we were interested in at the beginning of discussions."
Patrick Anderson can be reached at panderson@gloucestertimes.com.