are they just bad course managers ?
Recently I joined a threesome and was shocked at the blatant disregard for architectural features that would impact their play and scores.
They were playing against two other threesomes.
They hit several second shots into fairway bunkers that intrude into the fairway, short of a green.
One was on a par 4, the other on a par 5.
In neither case could they get to the green with their second shot, but, both bunkers were clearly in play.
Instead of playing short of the fairway bunkers, they hit away, and into them.
In other cases, with OB right, instead of teeing up right and hitting away from the OB, the golfer teed sup left and hit his tee shot OB.
In other situations, instead of putting or hitting a low lofted running shot, they used Lob, Sand or pitching wedges to front hole locations where semi-false fronts existed. In each and every case, they either left the ball short or hit it far beyond the hole.
In other instances I watched a higher handicap, who lacked power, take a wood out of deep, lush rough, repeatedly
As I watched mistep after mistep, it became apparent that a good coach/caddy/guide could save them a significant number of strokes, provided that they would listen.
Is there a sense amongst golfers that they can overcome the architectural features regardless of their abilities ?
Is there a sense amongst golfers that they're better than they really are ?
Or, do they lack the understanding of spacial relationships between the features, risk/reward and the continuum of the "wheels coming off syndrome ?