Methinks most here have miss the point of Zinger's comments. Of course none of us would cheer when an opponent misses a shot. But that's not exactly what Zinger was saying.
He did NOT implore our crowd to chear missed putts, not exactly. If you listened to his comments - and his explanations - what he encouraged the US fans to do was cheer for WINS of golf holes - no matter how such occurred. In the past, our crowds generally have cheered when our boys made putts to win holes, but no so much when the win occurred via an opponent's miss. That's a natural function of being used to watching individual play, where no matter how much one is rooting for Tiger, one does not cheer a Phil miss.... that's just the way golf works, world-wide.
In the UK/Europe, they figured out long ago that team golf is different from individual golf, for better or for worse - and cheering for a win no matter how it happens is OK. THus wins of holes achieved via US missed putts were always cheered... which of course must have seemed strange the first time it happened (and I trust Rich about it being 1981 Walton Heath), but just became more and more normal over there, such that it has occurred regularly ever since. Zinger's impression (right or wrong, who knows) was that this was NOT the case (or at least not as much) for matches held in the US - that is, that our fans cheered for wins achieved via made putts or concessions, but not so much for wins achieved via opponent's misses.
So he was encouraging our fans to make fair fair, and just act as the Europeans have for so long... just act in terms of what has become normal for this event.
Now you can argue that this behavior is bad form, bad for golf, bad for the Ryder Cup - whatever. In essence I'd agree; I prefer the old way where only made putts and good shots were cheered.
But I also think it's wrong to single out and vilify Zinger for his comments. All he was doing was trying to encourage our fans to support our team, in the manner that had become acceptable.
If one vilifies Zinger, one must also vilify all previous captains since 1981. None have spoken out against this practice and in fact all have seemingly encouraged it.
TH