News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re: shapers
« Reply #25 on: August 25, 2008, 06:52:26 PM »
JK:  Sorry to offend you, of all people.  I guess I should have spent a bit more time on my initial post, so I could spend less time on this one.

If Mr. Lehman had thought to mention that the boys had worked with us for several years, or if Mr. Pazin had not asked about their backgrounds, or if Kyle or Will ever posted here themselves, I probably wouldn't have said a thing.  But since the answer was (D) none of the above, I thought it was fair to mention where they had worked before (and give them credit for it, incdientally).  If you think that's a backhanded compliment or taking away credit, that's your opinion, but I disagree -- I think it's a lot better than most of the guys working for all of the other designers usually get.

The other point is that I mentioned them in the context I did because I have a bunch of other guys working with me who would be very sensitive that all of a sudden Kyle Franz is getting a bunch of praise on Golf Club Atlas -- for going to work for somebody else -- while others still work in relative obscurity for us, while their older brothers getting most of the credit.  That's inevitable in this business ... I've lost out on a lot of talented people in the past few years because they see too many guys between themselves and #1 on my depth chart, and none of my guys are taking off to become architects on their own.  Just capitalism in its purest form, I guess. 

Anyway, I didn't post anything on this subject for your benefit, nor to cast doubt on what Kyle and Will are building in Nebraska; I hope they'll get the proper credit for that at the proper time.  I posted mostly to try to keep my nucleus of guys intact, which is selfish in a different way.  So, here's proper credit to all of my associates (you can find their names on our web site), plus Kye Goalby and Mike McCartin and Jonathan Reisetter and George Waters (who's actually working for Kyle Phillips in Europe right now), for their own contributions to what we are doing and for what we have done.

There ARE many occasions (and this is not one of them) when guys get undue credit for different jobs because somebody mentioned their names here, and others know better.  (There are plenty of historical examples, too -- Dick Wilson at Shinnecock, CB Macdonald at Merion, etc., but I won't go there.)  I don't know how to stop it from happening without looking like an a-hole, so I don't speak up -- but it's easy to see how it happens when people start talking about shapers without having any idea what they really do, or what they have actually done.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2008, 06:54:54 PM by Tom_Doak »

John Kavanaugh

Re: shapers
« Reply #26 on: August 25, 2008, 07:06:55 PM »
Tom,

Thanks for the response.  It is a noble trait to not replace a loyal employee just because a more talented individual may come along.

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re: shapers
« Reply #27 on: August 25, 2008, 07:15:35 PM »
JK:  You did recognize the phrase "sixth man" as a sports analogy, didn't you?  There are a lot of great players in the NBA who don't currently have a starting job ... and there are lots who don't fit in one team who might be a star [or a championship-caliber role player] somewhere else.

The only problem is that on Golf Club Atlas, no one has any idea who is who.

P.S.  It only dawned on me after I posted that you might have been trying to stir up more trouble with your post.  No worries -- luckily for me, all of the shapers I've ever worked with are just as overconfident in their abilities as I am, so you'll never succeed in getting any of them to think any of the others might be better!  (With one exception.)
« Last Edit: August 25, 2008, 07:20:25 PM by Tom_Doak »

John Kavanaugh

Re: shapers
« Reply #28 on: August 25, 2008, 07:34:49 PM »
I'm in a business very similar to yours in that I need different number of individuals to operate equipment depending on the number of jobs and size of each.  I have my core operators who have worked for me for years that may not be as talented as a new guy out of the hall.  It would cause chaos and eventually hurt both production and quality to replace a loyal employee every time a new or better man comes along.

I only use this example to show that just because a man may be the sixth one I call it does not mean that he is less talented than the first or may build a road less enjoyable to drive.   I don't think the majority of people on this site have a clue about the synergy of a construction unit and may have felt that Lehman getting your sixth man could hurt the quality of his course compared to getting your number one guy.  I don't think the sports analogy fits at all when dealing with the lives of real people at real pay.  If I was paying NBA salaries I would have far less concerns about loyalty, ethics and if they could land a similar job if and when dismissed. 

Kyle Henderson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #29 on: August 25, 2008, 07:40:48 PM »
Welcome to GCA, Tom Lehman! I look forward to learning about the business from an elite player/designer perspective.

Note for all: Shackelford's website has a nifty little page about the construction of The Prairie Club's Short Course. Give it a gander.

http://www.geoffshackelford.com/prairie-club/


Regarding this new controvery: For the record, I find it very interesting to hear about the talented shapers and the different firms they've worked for.

Mr. Doak and Mr. Lehman have fingers in many of today's golf design pies and I feel priveledged to hear about the inner workings of the business from them, whatever their motives for posting here may be.

Fans of the NFL, NBA, MLB, etc. don't get to talk shop (i.e. the dynamics of today's talent pool) with GMs and coaches, or even those that design the stadiums. It's too bad some people want to focus on the negatives. If something really bothers you, why not write a personal message to the "culprit" instead of taking the thread off topic and feeding the demons that plague this forum?
"I always knew terrorists hated us for our freedom. Now they love us for our bondage." -- Stephen T. Colbert discusses the popularity of '50 Shades of Grey' at Gitmo

Joe Hancock

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #30 on: August 25, 2008, 07:50:16 PM »
C'mon, you guys have to admit that,as popular as Tom Lehman will hopefully be 'round these parts, this thread will stay active in large part because of the controversial nature of JK's post.

And, he's been right about things enough to make even his combatant adversaries here pay him the highest compliment by responding to his posts with great frequency.

Joe
" What the hell is the point of architecture and excellence in design if a "clever" set up trumps it all?" Peter Pallotta, June 21, 2016

"People aren't picking a side of the fairway off a tee because of a randomly internally contoured green ."  jeffwarne, February 24, 2017

Chris Kane

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #31 on: August 25, 2008, 08:00:29 PM »
C'mon, you guys have to admit that,as popular as Tom Lehman will hopefully be 'round these parts,

He may not be so popular among the European members of this board!

Joel_Stewart

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #32 on: August 25, 2008, 08:55:37 PM »
What makes a good shaper?

Jack Welch at GE always said to "hire people who are smarter than you."

Does a great shaper take orders well or do they have an imagination and creativity to exceed the architects vision.

Michael Dugger

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #33 on: August 25, 2008, 09:05:00 PM »
What makes a good shaper?

Someone who makes something you deem "good."

Mastery of machine and imagination to see the  finished product.

What does it matter if the poor player can putt all the way from tee to green, provided that he has to zigzag so frequently that he takes six or seven putts to reach it?     --Alistair Mackenzie--

paul cowley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #34 on: August 25, 2008, 09:53:44 PM »
Welcome aboard Tom and Chris!

 I have been to the property along with a few that I work with, and I will look forward to seeing your design solutions......pretty neat piece of dirt.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2008, 09:59:24 PM by paul cowley »
paul cowley...golf course architect/asgca

Jeff_Brauer

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #35 on: August 25, 2008, 10:20:30 PM »
Someone mentioned that Tom L has stirred the pot (or had it stirred for him) on his first post.  I noted that he actually has 6 posts!  Did he do that under an assumed name a while back, perhaps, and just now decided to come clean?

I hope he stays, but I doubt it. He is a thoughtful guy and could contribute a lot. I bet we would be a lot more civil around here knowing a celeb was here!
Jeff Brauer, ASGCA Director of Outreach

Joe Hancock

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #36 on: August 25, 2008, 10:29:15 PM »
Jeff,

He's posted on some other threads.

I don't know why you doubt he will stay. He seems into it.

Why would the uncivil care if a celeb is present?

Joe
" What the hell is the point of architecture and excellence in design if a "clever" set up trumps it all?" Peter Pallotta, June 21, 2016

"People aren't picking a side of the fairway off a tee because of a randomly internally contoured green ."  jeffwarne, February 24, 2017

henrye

Re: shapers
« Reply #37 on: August 25, 2008, 10:31:27 PM »
I think Tom L.'s contribution here is a wonderful example of appreciating his team.  He is obviously pleased to the point of believing their contribution warranted a public word of appreciation.  Well done Tom.  I'm sure the guys appreciate it.  

Ron Farris

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #38 on: August 26, 2008, 01:05:02 AM »
Tom,
Great to see you on this site and at the Site.
As you know the Sand Hills of Nebraska is a Spiritual Place.
I feel this site, as well as the Prairie Club, will only be enhanced with your presence.
Good job Kyle and Wil (Wil and Kyle) and everyone involved.

Adam Russell

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #39 on: August 26, 2008, 09:13:18 AM »
I had the pleasure of meeting Will Smith at Ballyneal's party, just like Clayman. I had no idea that he was graduated from the University of Georgia until one of the shapers for Tom D. said "hey, Will, you went to UGA didn't you? So does this intern, you guys have alot in common..." And Will said "I knew someone around here was from Georgia because no one in Colorado has a How 'Bout Them Dawgs! sticker on the back of their car!" And so began a good  conversation, albeit with an awkward start . If Will (who looks oddly like Dan Fouts) is as good a shaper as he is a person, The Prairie Club should impress.
BTW, I call shotgun on Lehman as a partner in GCA matches... mark it  ;D

Good to have you on board, Tom L. 

« Last Edit: August 26, 2008, 09:17:42 AM by Adam Russell »
The only way that I could figure they could improve upon Coca-Cola, one of life's most delightful elixirs, which studies prove will heal the sick and occasionally raise the dead, is to put rum or bourbon in it.” -Lewis Grizzard

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #40 on: August 26, 2008, 09:55:00 AM »
C'mon, you guys have to admit that,as popular as Tom Lehman will hopefully be 'round these parts, this thread will stay active in large part because of the controversial nature of JK's post.

And, he's been right about things enough to make even his combatant adversaries here pay him the highest compliment by responding to his posts with great frequency.

Joe

Guess that's one way of looking at it; kind of a sad statement on the world today.
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Joe Hancock

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #41 on: August 26, 2008, 10:24:13 AM »
C'mon, you guys have to admit that,as popular as Tom Lehman will hopefully be 'round these parts, this thread will stay active in large part because of the controversial nature of JK's post.

And, he's been right about things enough to make even his combatant adversaries here pay him the highest compliment by responding to his posts with great frequency.

Joe

Guess that's one way of looking at it; kind of a sad statement on the world today.

I hate to booger up this thread any more, but....

I know you have no love lost for JK. That's OK, and it reminds me to realize how blessed I am to be able to forget things in the past that may have offended me. That's not directed at JK or you or anyone else, that is how I am with everyone.

I appreciate JK's different viewpoints for what they are...different. Obviously, from the different posts above, JK wasn't the only one who read more into TD's reply. Right or wrong, who knows? TD has posted his rebuttal, and he seemed genuine in what he said. End of story, share a beer......

The world is sad, George. Has been since that little incident in the garden. It's not a today thing, it's only that today is when you and I are alive to realize it.

Like I've tried to teach my kids......be who you are, everywhere you happen to be, and don't harbor different personalities to meet your own needs, and say what you mean and mean what you say.

And, Tom Lehman loves his shapers....I really, really appreciate that!  :)

Joe
" What the hell is the point of architecture and excellence in design if a "clever" set up trumps it all?" Peter Pallotta, June 21, 2016

"People aren't picking a side of the fairway off a tee because of a randomly internally contoured green ."  jeffwarne, February 24, 2017

John Shimp

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #42 on: August 26, 2008, 10:34:13 AM »
Tom Lehman,
What particular features or specifics have gotten you as excited as you are about the work of kyle and will at prairie club?   Are they shaping particularly exciting putting surfaces, etc?  Is there a particular style/look to what you all are building?  I've seen the website pictures and can imagine what great talent could build out there.
Thanks for the post.

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #43 on: August 26, 2008, 10:36:51 AM »
Like I've tried to teach my kids......be who you are, everywhere you happen to be, and don't harbor different personalities to meet your own needs, and say what you mean and mean what you say.

Very similar to what I try to teach my son and my parents tried to teach me; I just don't believe you have to be an a'hole to live up to this. I've actually been okay with Jax for awhile, it's just this type of bs that gets my blood boiling.

There is being different and there is being an a'hole; much like Jax feels the need to constantly tell everyone on the site what everyone else's intentions are and posts truly mean, I feel the need to occasionally point out that his opinions are just opinions, and by constantly attacking others' motives, he will end up doing more to stifle honest discussion than anything else.

"I'm just being honest" must be the a'hole's credo. Somehow my mom manages to be the most honest person I've ever known and yet everyone I know also considers her to be one of the nicest. There is no honesty in attempting to read the thoughts of another.

I'm done with this. Jax did his part, I did mine. Believe me when I say these posts do not make me feel good in the least.
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Kalen Braley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #44 on: August 26, 2008, 11:11:50 AM »
Joe,

Not to be contrary, but i think the following quote sums it up best for me.

Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.

Sure every now and then his bravado can provide for a good chuckle, but I just don't know why this schtick and song&dance has to continue on a 24/7 basis.

Tom Lehman

Re: shapers
« Reply #45 on: August 26, 2008, 07:10:48 PM »
I hope we don't see Tom Lehman posting on the weekends.  ;)
I could not agree more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!javascript:replaceText('%20:)',%20document.forms.postmodify.message);

Mark Bourgeois

Re: shapers
« Reply #46 on: August 26, 2008, 07:41:49 PM »
Tom

Welcome to the discussion board.  I am a big fan of the way you carry yourself in public. I wish you every success in your design career.

I have a favor to ask. You've probably noticed this site has a "My Home Course" section where course profiles are posted.  It doesn't really have to be the writer's "home course," just one he's familiar with.
  So my favor is, would you mind asking Scott Hoch to write up The Old Course for the site?

Cheers
Mark

Ron Farris

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: shapers
« Reply #47 on: August 26, 2008, 08:02:41 PM »
FYI, the Lehman Design Group website is as follows:

http://www.lehmandesigngroup.com/

In the introduction you will find some of the transformation of Hole #7, a downhill par 3.