Kyle Henderson's photo essay of Sand Hills depicts an architectural design element not usually found -- a tee shot over the preceding hole's green. I've played one at one of my favorite Scottish courses, Cullen (where there are several crossing shots, admittedly.)
At first glance, this may seem awkward, or even dangerous. But is it?
-- If done on the tee shot immediately following said green, the green will likely be empty of all but the actual golf balls shot on approach.
-- Greens are often one of the first things placed/found by architects/designers, in part because they often sit on interesting land. Shouldn't tee pads share some of that interesting terrain?
-- On constrained sites, perhaps this is a way to squeeze in a better tee shot, or allow for needed lengthening.
Thoughts? Done properly, should it be considered more often, rather than automatically ruled out? Other examples of this that the board knows of? How well (or not) do they work?