Dan, I thought the book was as entertaining as golf books get, but I'm not saddened to learn that it is so historically inaccurate. Are you saying that the history from the book must be scrapped because it is completely false, or that there are too many mistakes for you to feel comfortable?
Whether the depiction in the book is entirely true or not, for those in my generation, Ken Venturi was a commentator on CBS, who used to play some golf. After reading Frost's book, I have an entirely new appreciation for Mr. Venturi and what he accomplished in life, and on tour. I'm absolutely stunned by how much I didn't know about him, and yet I used to think that I was relatively well read for my golfing generation. I still have miles to go before I sleep on this front, but consider that many of my peers read only the major golf magazine titles, and no historical or biographical materials whatsoever.
I guess I'm saying that I hope that there is something true we can take from Frost's work, becuase it really turned me on to the subject this summer, and has motivated me to read a lot more about Hogan, Venturi, CPC, etc. But it begs the question, what else is fantasy as you would imply? Should I fear that James Dodson's biography of Hogan is a fantasy as well?