News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


John Kavanaugh

Re: The View from Ben's Porch, July 27,2008
« Reply #25 on: August 13, 2008, 12:21:16 PM »
For purposes of this site or architectural critique I find Kyle's pictures with the cheap camera better than Neil's.  Does anyone else find Neil's pictures a bit too juicy?  Which colors are a more accurate representation?




« Last Edit: August 13, 2008, 12:24:06 PM by John Kavanaugh »

John Mayhugh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The View from Ben's Porch, July 27,2008
« Reply #26 on: August 13, 2008, 12:50:26 PM »
A friend of mine just returned from a visit to Sand Hills, and he brought me back a SH cap, in thanks for showing him this site, and for being as he said "a golf nut in general."

I've never had a cap from a course I've never played before. Am I allowed to wear it, or do I just put it on a wall somewhere?

Ethics masters, direct me please.

A cap brought from a friend is fine.  Once on ebay there was a bag from NGLA on sale for a great price.  I went to place a bid and the douche police cut off my internet connection when they found no mention of having ever played the place on GCA.  That of course was undeniable proof that I had not because it is a requirement to mention if you have played NGLA as part of you induction ceremony.  In other words...gear that is worn on a temporary basis is kosher but bags will get you in a pickle.
This raises a douche question.  Is it OK to carry a bag with the logo of a club you don't belong to?  I have always kept that off-limits.  have plenty of shirts & hats, but haven't tried the bag route yet. 

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The View from Ben's Porch, July 27,2008
« Reply #27 on: August 13, 2008, 12:56:28 PM »
Anything put up for sale by any club is perfectly OK to wear (or carry as the case may be) anytime you wish. And, I am sure my favorite capitalist Mr. Pazin agrees. ;)
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

RJ_Daley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The View from Ben's Porch, July 27,2008
« Reply #28 on: August 13, 2008, 01:05:21 PM »
I have seen SH more in Neil's lens, in late afternoon or very cloudy day than the startling greenery in Kyle's.  Neils is more representative. 

These are the hues of color that I know SH to be.


and a Neil's rather famous photo capturing the essence of the place...
No actual golf rounds were ruined or delayed, nor golf rules broken, in the taking of any photographs that may be displayed by the above forum user.

Neil Regan

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The View from Ben's Porch, July 27,2008
« Reply #29 on: August 13, 2008, 04:41:41 PM »
For purposes of this site or architectural critique I find Kyle's pictures with the cheap camera better than Neil's.  Does anyone else find Neil's pictures a bit too juicy? 

John,

  I do tend to "juice" my pictures too much. But in this case, that is very close to reality. I sharpened it maybe too much, but the colors are only a bit more saturated than the original,  which often happens when a large picture is re-sized for a small screen.
  That day was about 100 degrees with a rare humidity bouncing the light. We sat on the porch for a long while. People were talking, but mostly they were just watching.



Grass speed  <>  Green Speed

Forrest Richardson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The View from Ben's Porch, July 27,2008
« Reply #30 on: August 13, 2008, 04:59:16 PM »
That is not "juice". Rather, it is the aura from the most recent visit by the designer.   ;)
— Forrest Richardson, Golf Course Architect/ASGCA
    www.golfgroupltd.com
    www.golframes.com

PThomas

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The View from Ben's Porch, July 27,2008
« Reply #31 on: August 13, 2008, 08:21:58 PM »
a truly magical place, SH is!
199 played, only Augusta National left to play!

Brad Swanson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The View from Ben's Porch, July 27,2008
« Reply #32 on: August 13, 2008, 08:42:29 PM »
For purposes of this site or architectural critique I find Kyle's pictures with the cheap camera better than Neil's.  Does anyone else find Neil's pictures a bit too juicy?  Which colors are a more accurate representation?

John,

  I think Neil's pics are closer to the color palate I experienced at Sand Hills.  On a completely technical sidenote, I think Kyle's camera may be set at a high ISO setting, as these as well as all of his series of Ballyneal and Dismal River exhibit a significant amount amount of noise.  To my eye, the color saturation level in Kyle's shots looks boosted either in camera or in post-shot processing too.  Not a critique, just what my eye sees.

Cheers,
Brad

Kyle Henderson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The View from Ben's Porch, July 27,2008
« Reply #33 on: August 13, 2008, 10:06:29 PM »
For purposes of this site or architectural critique I find Kyle's pictures with the cheap camera better than Neil's.  Does anyone else find Neil's pictures a bit too juicy?  Which colors are a more accurate representation?

John,

  I think Neil's pics are closer to the color palate I experienced at Sand Hills.  On a completely technical sidenote, I think Kyle's camera may be set at a high ISO setting, as these as well as all of his series of Ballyneal and Dismal River exhibit a significant amount amount of noise.  To my eye, the color saturation level in Kyle's shots looks boosted either in camera or in post-shot processing too.  Not a critique, just what my eye sees.

Cheers,
Brad

When I take midday pictures, I do try to put some color back in (all of my Sand Hills pics). With good light, I usually leave things alone (lodging views and 18th green at Dismal). Ballyneal was a mixed bag of evening time (course walk) and daytime (during my golf rounds).
"I always knew terrorists hated us for our freedom. Now they love us for our bondage." -- Stephen T. Colbert discusses the popularity of '50 Shades of Grey' at Gitmo