Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 20, 2010, 11:27:17 AM
 
 
  • Architecture Timeline
  • Courses by Country
  • Feature Interview
  • The Next 50
  • Discussion Group
  • In My Opinion
  • Golf & Travel
  • Art & Architecture
  • Contributions
Golf Club AtlasGolfClubAtlas.comGolf Course Architecture (Moderators: Ben Cowan-Dewar, Ran Morrissett)Bunkers and Vegetation
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
Print
Author Topic: Bunkers and Vegetation  (Read 543 times)
Alan Gard
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 39



Bunkers and Vegetation
« on: September 13, 2008, 07:03:45 PM »

During a recent round I noticed bunkers on consecutive holes where the surrounding vegetation could have a significant influence on play.  The first was a greenside bunker with birch trees all along the back.  Their branches hung down so low that a shot from the front of the bunker required trajectory control to not hit the branches.  On the next hole was a fairway bunker with a large bush that hung down over the bunker.  One of our group hit it in there and had no chance to take much of a swing at the ball.

Is this good design to make bunkers more of a true hazard, or should a well-designed bunker generally be hazard enough?  What are some examples of vegetation infringing on a bunker's "personal space" that work well?  What are examples of bunkers most in need of bush/tree removal?

I appreciate your thoughts.
Logged
John Mayhugh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1496



Re: Bunkers and Vegetation
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2008, 09:43:26 PM »

Bunkers are hazards and I don't mind a little bit of flora making them more difficult.  I don't think it makes sense to do it too often, but every now and then it's OK.  I definitely prefer trees to ornamental grass or bushes that you can lose a ball in.

These birch trees are OK with me.
Logged
Grant Saunders
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 121



Re: Bunkers and Vegetation
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2008, 01:48:03 AM »

Note the pile of leaves in the front where it appears they have been raked out of the bunker.

Trees that close to a bunker are a maintenance headache. Leaves need to be removed constantly and roots can extend into the bunker and make play and raking difficult.

Im not for or against them, it is just important to consider that it will require higher maintenance inputs.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2008, 01:49:58 AM by Grant Saunders » Logged
Adam Clayman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4818

Nature and Human Nature


Re: Bunkers and Vegetation
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2008, 06:39:24 AM »

Go to almost any coastal area that has sand dunes or an area with sand blowouts and see how the vegitation is dispersed around and within the blowout. This random dispersion is sexy due to its naturalness.
Logged

If we have never had a bad lie we are not likely to appreciate a good one, moreover, the ability to play from a bad lie differentiates between a good player and a bad one. We might also remark that good and bad lies differentiate between good sportsmen and bad.
ALISTER MACKENZIE
Tim Bert
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 2330



Re: Bunkers and Vegetation
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2008, 07:50:08 AM »

I'm not a fan of the look of the bunker in John's picture.  One tree might work, but the number of trees in that picture appear to be a bit excessive.  Particularly since many of the low branches are low-hanging over the blast area and the trees are positioned such that they may impact a left-handers stance.

This is a much superior bunker in my opinion.  A nice thick bush where one could lose a ball, and where the right-handers stance would be much more impacted than the lefty.

Logged
Jon Wiggett
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1196


Had to look sideways to see the flag


Re: Bunkers and Vegetation
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2008, 09:58:17 AM »

Quote from: Tim Bert on September 14, 2008, 07:50:08 AM
I'm not a fan of the look of the bunker in John's picture.  One tree might work, but the number of trees in that picture appear to be a bit excessive.  Particularly since many of the low branches are low-hanging over the blast area and the trees are positioned such that they may impact a left-handers stance.

This is a much superior bunker in my opinion.  A nice thick bush where one could lose a ball, and where the right-handers stance would be much more impacted than the lefty.



Tim,

you appear to think that it is fairer to impede right handers more than left handers. I don't think this is something that should be taken into account in GCA.

I believe such vegetation is alright as long as it doesn't over run the bunker completely. The player should be challenged and fairness is not something that should be taken too much into account but it must be playable in one form or another.
Logged
Tim Bert
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 2330



Re: Bunkers and Vegetation
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2008, 10:09:37 AM »

Quote from: Jon Wiggett on September 14, 2008, 09:58:17 AM
Tim,

you appear to think that it is fairer to impede right handers more than left handers. I don't think this is something that should be taken into account in GCA.

Jon,

Perhaps I'm just a left-hander with a misunderstood sense of humor.
Logged
Eric Smith
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1196



WWW
Re: Bunkers and Vegetation
« Reply #7 on: September 14, 2008, 10:37:38 AM »



7th at Forest Dunes

Push your second shot just a smidgen on this par 5 and hope to find it in the sand portion of this bunker.  The tree alone would be tolerable, but the low growth ornamental stuff is a penalty drop every time, IF you can find it in there.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2008, 10:45:51 AM by Eric Smith » Logged

Life's just a game, it's just one epic holiday.
Jon Wiggett
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1196


Had to look sideways to see the flag


Re: Bunkers and Vegetation
« Reply #8 on: September 14, 2008, 10:46:28 AM »

Quote from: Tim Bert on September 14, 2008, 10:09:37 AM
Quote from: Jon Wiggett on September 14, 2008, 09:58:17 AM
Tim,

you appear to think that it is fairer to impede right handers more than left handers. I don't think this is something that should be taken into account in GCA.

Jon,

Perhaps I'm just a left-hander with a misunderstood sense of humor.

It would seem so. I never understood the fasination of that side of the ball Grin
Logged
John Mayhugh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1496



Re: Bunkers and Vegetation
« Reply #9 on: September 14, 2008, 05:58:46 PM »

Quote from: Tim Bert on September 14, 2008, 10:09:37 AM
Quote from: Jon Wiggett on September 14, 2008, 09:58:17 AM
Tim,

you appear to think that it is fairer to impede right handers more than left handers. I don't think this is something that should be taken into account in GCA.

Jon,

Perhaps I'm just a left-hander with a misunderstood sense of humor.
You can say that again.   Grin
Logged
Pages: [1]
Print
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | Valid XHTML
Web Hosting by ConnectNC


Admin
Loading...