John,
You CORRECTLY observed, "Phillip, I know you are looney, but this is a new level. How many tournaments does a low level assistant professional get to play? Why would she do that?"
I was speaking quite tongue-in-cheek. Still, she does have many real options including going back to scholl as she said was her goal for the immediate future, yet she seems to be doing anything but that.
What I can't understand, and it certainly may have something to do with the extent of my looniness, is why so many people feel she actually deserves the privilege of playing competitively against the men of the PGA Tour? She has done nothing to show that it's even in the realm of reality and her showings in her past attempts to do so were near-unanimously viewed as both major mistakes and quite harmful to her development as a player.
Frankly, with tongue firmly out of cheek, what would be so degrading about her becoming an assistant professional and having a career as a teaching pro? There are a lot of talented players who could have done well on their tours who have chosen such a path.
Take away the huge endorsement deal and early PR blitz and the idea of working up and through a "normal route" onto the tour would be both expected and applauded.
I differ from those who suggest that her biggest problem lies with her parents grandiose ideas and poor career guidance. Her biggest mistake was not becoming a lady Tiger Woods for, after all, isn't that how she was advertised and presented from the very beginning?