I can see where a set up of 6100 yards would be much more 'fair' than tees at ~6800, even if proportionate to the ladies strength level. Isn't 6100 a wee short even for ladies of that calibre? And, I assume the rough was graduated with a very wide intermediate cut. I think Mike Hendren and I played in the 67-6800 range. The carries, and course management issues are vastly different. I can't even imagine what the course would be at the full 77-7800 for the big boys, particularly if the rough was about 1/3rd as wide as it was generously cut when we were there. (I'd estimate intermediate 3 inch cut at about 12ft+ each side when we saw it) Again, I can't see how they could play any serious tournament without forecaddies out on every hole spotting where the many blind ball shots land, particularly if they play FWs at 30wide or less.
Have they had any college matches there? And, we still haven't gotten a sense of what scores were winning holes in this Women's PL routinely, pars, birdies or bogeys.
I must get down there again yet this year to be fair minded. Maybe even multiple times. The fact that she drained after that rain, and maybe even firmed up is impressive. I must say that Mike and I played it after heavy rains the previous day late last summer and it was quite soft.