TMac,
It is really nice to have you back. Perhaps now you will post in some detail your thoughts on the Nicklaus renovated Scarlet course. I've asked Bill Steele for an update, but he has not been out there since the work was completed.
As to TPS, I gather that you have not played it and are opining from viewing it on the flat tube. I have played it three times, before Rees and after, and I just don't get the negativity. I am not a big fan of RTJ, so it is not that I am a fan of difficult, penal courses. In fact, at the expense of commiting GCA heresy and being excommunicated, I think Winged Foot West is the second most overrated course I have ever played (I would also place Firestone South right up there).
I think that TPS will be a good test for the US Open contestants where, according to former USGA president Sandy Tatum, the objective is to identify the best player not to introduce them to the Redan, Biarritz, Short, Alps, etc. (though there might be a quasi-Cape or two on the course). I also believe that the USGA is right-on in choosing some munis from time to time to conduct its most important tournament.
As to how the public management of the club spent the $3+ million, I could not see it but I am told that not a small part of it went underground for drainage and irrigation. Unlike Augusta National, they didn't bulldoze the prior back tees, so the course can be played from pretty short to maybe 7200 yards (I understand that the public is seldom allowed to play the new back boxes).
I know that popular acclaim and critical analysis are two different things, but given the high green fee and difficulty in getting tee times, do you think that there might be tens of thousands who believe that TPS is "an interesting, fun, thought-provoking, and memorable golf course"? I wonder what percentage of golfers would be proud to call TPS home?