Mr. Morrow,
You have a very interesting perspective on these issues. Mistaken I think, but interesting nonetheless.
In your last paragraph you warn: "make no assumptions as that seem to get you into deep water, you don’t know what people are thinking."
Yet you write of me:
"It seems so obvious that you must be trying to cause a problem for certain individuals or this site, because I do not believe you to be a stupid man, far from it, but your actions seem very deliberate." Perhaps you should heed your own advice, as you are completely wrong about my intentions.
I don’t believe this debate has been worthy of this site. I blame you for that because you had previous knowledge of the existing members and I suspect that you knew the reaction you would generate.
This the the part I found so fascinating.
You blame me because I knew the reaction I would generate from TEPaul, Wayne, and Mike? I like to think that we are each responsible for our own behavior, so I have trouble accepting responsibility for TomPaul's misbehavior or anyone elses.
Even now, while you criticize me for participating at all, TEPaul maligns me and attacks me for not entertaining his endless questions, even though we have discussed his exact theory for page after page after page! It seems I am sinister if I reply and worse if I don't.
You suggest I should never have come back because I knew there was a chance that TEPaul, Wayne, and Mike Cirba might I freak out again?
Maybe it is a character flaw, but that doesn't work for me. I've never been good with bullies, and have always preferred taking a black eye or two rather than allowing bullying to dissuade me from doing what I would otherwise do. That seems to be exactly what you would have preferred, but that is not my nature.
Don't get me wrong. They had nothing to do with why I came back. I came back in spite of them, not because of them. And while you may not think it justifies my behavior, when hit and hit and hit I will eventually hit back. Childish maybe, but we all have our faults.
What is it again that justifies your harsh words toward me? I should have stayed away because I knew they might again try to bully me? I should not respond no matter how rude and untruthful their comments might become? I said that Wayne has taken his ball and gone home?
Do you think my words for them (like my ball comment) have been anymore harsh or hostile than your comments to me?
How would you respond to the following post?
David Moriaty, it has become patently clear to me and it should be clear to everyone else on here that you have no interest at all, NONE, in discussing what went on at Merion in the era you selected for your essay, and of course we understand why---you will be proven wrong and you can't take that. On most of these Merion threads now you have absolutely defaulted any responsibility to discuss what you said in that essay and this has turned into nothing more than you constantly complaining about manners and incivility on here. You should switch over to some website on manners if you can't or won't engage in a discussion on architecture as it relates to the specious reasoning in your essay on Merion and these threads. I don't know what it is about you but every thread you have ever been on on this website has been an unmitigated disaster. Why in the world I ever was so foolish enough to encourage you to come back on this site is absolutely beyond me. You are much worse than you've ever been. It is a totally pathetic display you're carrying on here and I can't imagine what is going on with the administrators of GOLFCLUBALTAS.com to allow it to continue.
I think I'll ignore it. But I am sure that many will see that as somehow provoking them.