Bob:
I find no problem at all with the young man choosing to represent his school.
Small semi-off-topic observation: As one somewhat closely involved in high school athletics. I've noted a disturbing trend in high school athletes choosing to forego interscholastic athletics and instead opting to play for their local "club" team, which often travels around the state and even region, competing against similar club teams. I've found and heard that they are often encouraged to do so by club coaches, with subtle undertones that high school athletics are holding back the young athletes' development. It's a growing trend in sports such as soccer, swimming, volleyball, track and field, and -- yes -- golf. I find the practice repugnant, in all honesty.
The other night, I attended a local high school girls soccer game with my family held between my local high school and a neighboring high school. The two schools are separated by a municipal boundary, but sit within a half-mile of each other. Several of the best players on each squad grew up playing on the same local recreational soccer team, and are of the caliber that they could go off and play for a local club team and forego high school athletics. Instead, they chose to play for, and represent, their local school -- and by extension their school colleagues and communities. The game was hard-fought, cleanly played, with sportsmanship on ample display by both sides. About 100 of us on a cold and blustery Friday night watched it. To me, it was the epitome of what high school athletics ought to represent, and at its best, does.
We have several folks involved in high school athletics (Stan Dodd comes to mind) who post regularly on the board. I don't mean to hi-jack this thread (apologies if I've done so), but I wonder about their thoughts on this.