News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Framing Bunkers or Visual Deception?
« on: April 14, 2008, 07:42:30 AM »
A comment on another thread (and seeing a few famous greens at Augusta this weekend) concerning Dr Mac's surrounding bunkers and acting as visual deception got me to thinking about surrounding bunkers in general. 


I often don't care for the look, but I can see where visual deception could come into play.  However, when can surrounding bunkers be hailed as visually deceptive and when can the be labelled as framing bunkers?  Below are a few pics from Spyglass.  Framing or visually deceptive?  I don't think they are done anywhere near as good as the Dr Mac bunkers (or even the version we have today).  Is the aesthetic aspect one of the criteria which help with differentiating?



Another example from Old Town. 


An example from Whistling Straits.


I could be wrong, but I get the impression that Dr Mac was somewhat unusual in his use of rear bunkering so frequently.  I could also be wrong in that I don't think this technique is used all that often today.  We see a lot of it here because Tom D used this style of bunkering on some of his dunesy properties.  Is there a substantive difference in how these bunkers are used today than by Dr Mac in the old days?  I would be really interested in people's thoughts on the subject.

Seeking out further pix of bunkering which I didn't consider framing, but rather an offering to the golfer to aim away from the back bunker if he doesn't believe he can control the distance.  Of course, this works best when the incorrect angle of approach leaves the pin between the golfer and the back bunker.  A few examples from Merion.



Ciao
« Last Edit: April 14, 2008, 08:31:29 AM by Sean Arble »
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Framing Bunkers or Visual Deception?
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2008, 11:25:31 AM »
Mac's bunkers pictured look to me to serve two purposes. 1. Put the thoght of a tiny green in the golfers mind. 2. Confuse the eye and keep it from focussing.

Whistling Staits is the only one pictured that remotely begins to approximate this.

I hate the picture from Old Town.
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Adam Clayman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Framing Bunkers or Visual Deception?
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2008, 01:46:35 PM »
Sean, There's also the rear invisible bunkers which serves a similar purpose, once you've seen it and fallen for the architects gotcha.
 Upon a repeat play the unseen rear bunker is front and center in the mind of the golfer. Eliminating the desire to be too aggressive.

Stanely Thompson also used this technique at Jasper and Banff.  One could speculate that since many of the rear bunkers added at Jasper Park were after seeing Mackenzie's work, he borrowed the concept.

BTW, Ran made the exact point made on the other thread of how todays archie would be bashed for creating too much eye candy. 
"It's unbelievable how much you don't know about the game you've been playing your whole life." - Mickey Mantle