Bryan Izatt,
Had you seen the golf course you would have realized that the angle of the photo bears NO resemblance to how the hole appears to the golfer.
Matt Cohn's photo is a far more accurate depiction of the green.
And, as you can see in Matt's photo, the green is perfectly "framed" as you requested.
As to your conclusions, they're way off base, a tribute to the fact that you've never seen the course and thus shouldn't comment on how it looks, especially when the photo used to reference the 18th green is from a useless angle.
Many tend to be critical of ANGC when they haven't seen it in person.
Far fewer are critical after they've experienced it.
Why do you think that is ?