I'd say the reason there are no template or traditional hole designs out there at BallyNeal or SH is that simple fact that the terrain is infinitely diverse and the mind bursts with all sorts of new concepts when walking and planning out corridors for golf. Why go with something already done, and more importantly, why shape beautiful nature to have something already done and familiar when you can have something first seen and conceived?
While I get Mike's drift about the allure of an "up and over" hole as he speaks; there are actually many angles on the existing holes that were completed by C&C or TD that do have this up and over feature if you are on the right or wrong side of the FW approach.
Actually, with the land and sand blow out styles that are now part of the modern sand hill golfer's imprint of hole characteristics and designs, I would lean towards the notion that new "template holes" based on design concepts TD and C&C came up with, may be the result if many new 'sand hill' or 'prairie' golf courses spring up there. Those two design firms are the new pioneers of golf in the sand hills and their design concepts would be the ones to emulate by those that follow.
But, still the infinite diversity of the terrain suggests that the designer go their own way, and not copy anything... just find routes and strategies that suit that exist there...