Lou,
That's great golfing, 4 under after 14 at Cypress Point, on he first try no less. How did you concentrate on golf, with all that beauty around you?
I found 16 to be the best heroic shot in golf, bar none. No single golf shot has more riding on its' outcome. The prize is to conquer nature itself, with seeming little addition of the hand of man. The comensurate thrill of breaching that chasm can only be understood by those who have done it. Of course that must be validated by an up and down or two putt. Thank goodness the Doctor gave us the largest, and least contoured green to accomplish it on.
What really struck me about the hole is how well it functions on two disticnt levels; as the greatest one shot hole from one angle, and a fabulous short par 4 from another. The green is surrounded by 6 bunkers which bracket the target beautifully for those wishing to tackle the long carry. However, from the layup area these same 6 bunkers do a fantastic job of protecting the putting surface. How many greens work this well from two distinct points of the compass? Maybe the answer to Rich's problem with 18 is to play 16 with two balls, like Mike Clayton, as a par 4 and a par 3 and use the 18th to settle bets!
My overall impression is that Dr. MacKenzie does not get enough credit for making Cypress Point what it is. Although universally acclaimed as a great site, and revered as one of the top 3 golf courses world wide, what lessons in design have become commonplace from here? Where else do you let the site dictate the design and find back to back par 5's and par 3's, three consecutive dogleg right par 4's (each playing uniquely different), and most importantly, bunkers placed in the field of play that must either be boldly crossed to attack the hole, or carefully avoided, if one's game is not up to the challange. This alone could be why the course works so well, to this day, for a match between the long and short hitter from the same tiny teeing ground. In "The Spririt of St. Andrews", MacKenzie states that Marion Hollins demonstrated the shot to the 16th green site to Seth Raynor, not the Doctor. I wonder, would the hole be as "perfect" if he designed it?