It's interest the different approach various clubs take to their "ranges". I think strategy and purpose drives architecture: is it a "warm up" facility, or a "practice" facility.
Take the example of these two clubs:
1) The Boston Club: "building" the range is in progress, but when complete it will be a grassy hill that you can bash balls into prior to a round. An effective and efficient "warm up" area. Perfect for the task.
2) Across the street at Black Rock: I dare not ask how much of our annual maintenance budget goes to the practice area. Two full grass hitting areas (separate area for "pros" and lessons), half dozen target greens on the range of all shapes and sizes with greenside bunkers, two practice putting greens (one by the range, one between the 1st and 10th tees), a full practice short game green with fairway, rough, and bunkers, and, most recently, a fairway bunker practice area that allows full shots out of sand at the range targets.
If I were in to practicing this cursed game, I would certainly take more advantage of the Black Rock set up. As it is my pre-round demands are pretty simple: a flat piece of land where I can figure out which girl I brought to the dance, a green that accurately relflects the slopes and speeds of the greens on the course, and maybe a bunker that has the same sand as found on the course.
Cheerio,
mjw