On the SC thread a few folks made comments about the thinking they have a fairly good idea of the type of courses I really enjoy. It didn't upset me in any way, but it made me wonder. First off, it struck me how I must have been sending out information for folks to gather their impressions and enough so for them to feel fairly confident in expressing that opinion. I have always thought I like a variety of courses, but now I wonder if I am quite restrictive in what I really like. In any case, I also started thinking about courses I have some time for, but would acknowledge that perhaps, for whatever reason, others may really rate much higher than I would and that maybe they are right. Courses which immediately come to mind are Muirfield, Pinehurst & Birkdale.
I have a high opinion of Muirfield based mostly on its bunkering and that it is a great experience. I don't think this is nearly enough or that there are enough other things going on to rate super highly in my book, but Muirfield is nearly always rated as one of the best courses on the planet. I welcome suggestions as to why others may think that Muirfield is one of the best.
I love the idea that its difficult to lose a ball at Pinehurst and that shots slide away without any terribly apparent good reasons. Its also a good walk and some of the greens are corkers. However, I am apt to think the course is a bit one dimensional around the greens. Any ideas as to why this course should be seen as one of the best in the world?
Birkdale, I loved it the first few times I played it and have since soured on it a bit. The routing of the holes seems to be much of a muchness through the dunes. Birkdale doesn't strike me as a very adventerous course considering its setting. I realize that many don't hold Birkdale in the same regard as the earlier two, but it isn't far off. Any folks out there that can explain why Birkdale is thought of so highly.
Do you folks have courses that you like, but don't understand why many place them among the very best in the world?
Ciao