News:

This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.

Pages: 1 [2]

PThomas

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Are Tom Doak's "least discussed" courses only those without ragged bunkers?
« Reply #25 on: January 09, 2008, 11:15:54 AM »
fwiw, the bunkers in pic 2 remind me of the bunkers at Pasa now
Logged
199 played, only Augusta National left to play!

Matthew Hunt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Are Tom Doak's "least discussed" courses only those without ragged bunkers?
« Reply #26 on: January 09, 2008, 11:21:35 AM »
Quote from: Paul_Turner on January 09, 2008, 10:25:57 AM
Ragged bunkers=Sandy Site=Better Course?

Yes I think it a 'Cart before the horse thing'. At Riverfront they would of looked so out of place.
« Last Edit: January 09, 2008, 11:22:06 AM by Matthew Hunt »
Logged

John Moore II

Re:Are Tom Doak's "least discussed" courses only those without ragged bunkers?
« Reply #27 on: January 09, 2008, 01:57:51 PM »
In all realilty, neither of the courses pictured looks natural, those sites are not sandy sites, so sand will not look natural any way you make it. I have nothing against courses being 'manufactured' though, I as a matter of fact like some of those type courses I have played.
Logged

Mark_Fine

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Are Tom Doak's "least discussed" courses only those without ragged bunkers?
« Reply #28 on: January 09, 2008, 04:52:49 PM »
For those wondering, the first picture is Hanse's work at French Creek and the second photo is Doak's at Stonewall.  
« Last Edit: January 09, 2008, 04:53:16 PM by Mark_Fine »
Logged

Ryan Farrow

Re:Are Tom Doak's "least discussed" courses only those without ragged bunkers?
« Reply #29 on: January 09, 2008, 06:46:15 PM »
*In the second picture notice the relationship between the cloud formations and bunker shapes  ;D  I didn't know Tom Doak was much into that philosophy.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back