One of the great mysteries of my world is when the webmeisters post issues online. I've seen it happen before the print version hits the street (bad) and well after, too. I do hope it turns up before the actual event date!
I didn't read the debate in the other thread, but I was trying to make the general point that a great amateur event like the Crump Cup can be a really nice way to study architecture, esp. compared to a Tour event, where you're confined within the ropes and can't see angles from the perspective of the players. As far as anyone achieving insights while playing, I've got to agree with Wayne Morrison (in the other CC thread currently on page 1), I think many would learn more about PV (especially PV!) by having the luxury of not having to execute the shots themselves. Having played there twice now, it's like a fog sets in and you're just trying to survive. (I'm not a very good player, though, so JMHO)
I do think that some of the participants spend a lot of time digesting a round afterward in search of a greater understanding of PV. Interviewing a handful of the players gave me the impression that it is all hard-earned wisdom. A guy like Garth McGimpsey, who has played in the Walker Cup (!) at PV, still seemed to be asking himself questions about the ideal yardage from which to approach the 2nd green, how much is too much spin, and so on.
Anyway. It's an awesome event, one any card-carrying GCAer would love, guaranteed....