Joe, yes JK has a good point to say the holes look ANGC like. (there, I said it
)
But, how did the ANGC bunkers and "look" evolve and seemingly to the same look that SH has been displaying? It wasn't the original archies in either case that first designed the wide perfect oval bunkers. Wasn't it really the never ending drive towards crisp line perfection? R.B. Harris has always been in my mind the early proponent of those moon faced, wide open oval to circle sort of sand scoops.
I do think Mike is right about less trees, more golf.
And the shaved surrounds look like they might be interesting. But, I go back to what the heat will require in the way of water during day syringing and overnights. Will they do that watering as per conventional turf wisdom, or will they let them get near death during the week and possibly incurr the wrath of the members? I am assuming the measures to get the course looking this green and perfect to-date was to baby the turf for months. Thus, it would seem to me that it would be the antithesis of the Hancock harden them off by tough love or the Scott Anderson approach to cultivating a strong cultivar of drought, heat resistant variety that would endure and bounce back. Would that be nearly correct thinking, Joe?