Tom Doak,
While not that many golfers may have played PV, it's legend spread with every returning guest, and their audiences.
In addition to it's legendary difficulty and unique hazards, the
"not seeing other golfers" facet became desirable because it was part of the "whole package" PV represented to the golfing universe.
Club after club wanted to reproduce the isolation of holes/golfers as evidenced by PV.
At the same time, a period of benign neglect was occuring at PV. Bunkers, fairways and corridors of play were allowed to be intruded upon by unbridled growth, thus, one of the Icons of American Golf was sending out the wrong message to those who felt that imitating PV couldn't be wrong.
In addition to landscaping, or perhaps as an adjunct to landscaping, the desire to "frame" target areas became prevalent, especially where greens were concerned.
Again, lacking foresight, many clubs planted trees so close to the greens that as the trees matured the roots went into the surrounding bunkers and greens, along with the drip lines, creating problems with playability and agronomy.
Once one local club embarked upon an arbor program, the neighboring clubs jumped in. So, club after club rushed to line every fairway, frame every tee and green, never contemplating the impact that the mature plantings would have on visuals, agronomy and playability.
Call it the perfect storm, or the need to present something unique, but the forces that impacted clubs at the local level were now into the fad of planting trees, mostly, indescriminately.
Michael Fay,
It was after the 59 Open at WFW that WF went on an arbor kick. However, I don't think anyone involved with that endeavor contemplated the impact to the playing corridors, that the drip lines, at the maturity of those tree, would have.
And, because growth is subtle, imperceptable, as the membership aged and turned over, the general consensus amongst the evolving membership became, "that those trees had always been intended to be there"
One only has to examine the rosters of the WF's, GCGC's and other clubs of the U.S. to see that very few of today's members were members in 1959, and, if you can find them, you'll be hard pressed to get accurate and complete information regarding what happened because they were usually too young at the time (1959) to be in any position of authority or in a reliable information loop.
I think that's one of the great values of aerial and ground leve photographic presentations and preservations.
They tell an undeniable story, absent the info behind it.